consider what framework authors are feeling when watching that talk.
-
-
Replying to @youyuxi
Alex and many others considering a future wherein the web is a historical footnote and proprietary runtimes rule client computing
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianleroux
and you think that justifies his consistent patronizing attitude when pushing that vision.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @youyuxi
fuck no but I also dgaf about other people's delivery of important information ffs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux
so what issues are you having with my original tweet, exactly?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @youyuxi
kicks off a thread delegitimizing one of the most important thinkers of our craft delivering an uncomfortable message of failure
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux
I have no intention in delegitimizing the person nor his work; just the fact that there could be a better way to communicate.
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @youyuxi @brianleroux
I'd go further. I think the work done so far on alternatives is insufficient and unproven. The message is premature.
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
This is hurting the web in the long run. We're shielded from real solutions by the illusion that one exists today.
3 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
For example "big payload blobs" is generalization that is unproven. E.g. WebAssembly blobs have different tradeoffs.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
and we've stagnated on "integrity URLs for shared binaries" for literally years.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.