I get my tech news from vox, here http://www.vox.com/2016/10/7/13205520/us-accuse-russia-putin-dnc-hack?0p19G=c …
-
-
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
good enough to at least get past "no evidence"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
I'm not convinced. Given what's known about e.g. Podesta's email “security”, not much sophistication would have been needed for that part
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @stilkov
you might be letting biases get the better of you here. I'm not saying I know for sure, but empirical evidence looks strong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
If bias interfered, it would steer me the other way. It just looks like inventing “sophisticated actors” to excuse incompetence
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @stilkov
my primary point here is that people have historically expressed concern that govts know so much that they can easily interfere.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it's now clear that governments can easily interfere in elections with minimal consequences. This is concerning.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
and to be clear, I specifically mean interference caused by secret knowledge using powers granted by law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
the level of impunity of the various attempts in this election has reached a new high.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.