If in 2005, you were trying to come up with a nightmare scenario for the government using its enhanced powers to harm a candidate 1/
-
-
I'm not convinced. Given what's known about e.g. Podesta's email “security”, not much sophistication would have been needed for that part
-
you might be letting biases get the better of you here. I'm not saying I know for sure, but empirical evidence looks strong.
-
If bias interfered, it would steer me the other way. It just looks like inventing “sophisticated actors” to excuse incompetence
-
I don't think you need Russia to have been particularly sophisticated to be concerned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.