citation on 90% of drones killing civilians unintentionally?
-
-
-
Replying to @csuwildcat
Reading, but quickly: the headline doesn't match your claim.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @csuwildcat
hm this source is not very credible to me yet. Reading more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @csuwildcat1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @wycats @csuwildcat
I'm interested in corroborating journalism by someone other than the Intercept.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @csuwildcat
I'm calling bullshit. The primary source here details a specific operation that had a very poor rate. 1/pic.twitter.com/zUHp1jlUsd
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
it's the only official numbers leak I've ever heard of; if you know of others, I'm interested in taking a look.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csuwildcat
do you think it's reasonable to assume that the focus on this leak by the source & Intercept implies it was the worst outcome?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
I think any civilian killings due to interventionist bombing are abhorrent and unacceptable, so 90% vs 50, 40, 30, etc is irrelevant
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.