Paul Graham cannot today suggest with any credibility that some moral logic requires him to stay shackled to a partnership with Thiel.
-
-
politics is everywhere ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Don’t you think people should not be prosecuted for their political views? I mean by their co-workers, not just by the state
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Donating >$1,000,000 is not a "view" and he's not a co-worker, he's an investor and sorta partner.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think it's reasonable for people to object strongly to donating > million dollars when they themselves agree he's dangerous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
sure. Have a political argument. Why bring his professional activities into the picture? Donations make him less of a VC?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
believing that a Trump presidency is good for the economy makes me question his business judgment, yes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
so have an argument with HIM on the issues you are concerned with. You went straight into pressing his partners
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted Yehuda Katz 🥨
here's what I said:https://twitter.com/wycats/status/787759556046692352 …
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
this was before @sama's blog post, which is more-or-less what I was asking for (despite some reasoning I didn't agree with)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.