doesn't lock second level deps which is *not* deterministic. that's clear!
-
-
Replying to @brianleroux @janl and
second level does are locked by the top level so yes it is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds @thejameskyle and
oh ok. so all levels are then thusly locked?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianleroux @janl and
yeah locked at app level which is far more useful than recursive
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds @thejameskyle and
on might saypic.twitter.com/hNU37qnLlR
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianleroux @janl and
if u locked @ all lvls u cud just specify exact vers in all package.json's
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds @thejameskyle
could u point me to a noob level post on lockfiles? I'm a little lost at this point and want to grok what u all are discussing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @reybango
still need to write something specific to yarn, this is the topic were discussing though: http://yehudakatz.com/2010/12/16/clarifying-the-roles-of-the-gemspec-and-gemfile/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
thx that was really helpful. Is this thread on Twitter about issues w/ lockfiles being generated for packages vs apps?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @reybango @thejameskyle
it's about using package level ones when building the dep graph for apps
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted BOOlean 👻 🐶 🏳️🌈
there's also this from cargo https://twitter.com/thejameskyle/status/787058377193062400 … (more articulate and recent)
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.