so… if I'm reading this right its "deterministic" but only to direct deps not sub deps?
-
-
Replying to @brianleroux @mikeal and
bingo: not deterministic at all. — Mind, I respect wycats design, but the marketing says…
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @janl @brianleroux and
still completely deterministic all the way down just without recursive lockfiles...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds @janl and
... Which is the only logical thing to do here
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds @janl and
I'll write something up about it... Its a bad idea to respect lockfiles recursively
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds @thejameskyle and
— yes, but then please ack like wycats does that it’s not deterministic ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @janl @brianleroux and
you're misunderstanding
@wycats he's not saying it's not deterministic right now2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds @thejameskyle
I tried to avoid dragging him into here, please respect.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @jamiebuilds @thejameskyle
basic twitter etiquette. Would appreciate if you’d respect. Thx.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
fwiw I appreciate you not dragging me in, but also appreciated getting tagged in to explain our thinking :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.