@yoshuawuyts Have you heard any news about the bind-operator proposal? I can't find anything related to the status of it.
-
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
such a damn shame, I could really use it in my code. cc
@BrendanEich@wycats ?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
People see utility, don't agree on priority or ::. I like it, including ::http://obj.foo shorthand.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
probably fine to move forward with it; should give up on avoiding C++'s "everyone uses a diff 10%" in JS
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Not worried about the disjoint subsets issue, and I don't recall it coming up against :: the bind operator.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
"this syntax surprises me, but is possible using a different syntax" is the way you get disjt subsets
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
but I think I'm ready to concede efforts to control the JS complexity budget because subsets possible
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
it might sound like I'm being sarcastic (or bitter) but I'm not. Just realistic :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.