Stellar example of "Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish". Don't be fooled by this tactic. They're not here for you. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish …https://twitter.com/yarnpkg/status/785857780838232064 …
-
-
Replying to @Amorelandra @nexxylove
given https://github.com/yarnpkg/rfcs I could even make an argument that yarn is _more_ open source than npm's cli
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @steveklabnik
I don't share
@nexxylove's apprehension, but no specific governance model is inherently more or less "open", really.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
they've clearly expressed intent, which is good, but that's all. Action takes longer, and it's not a competition.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I've been on enough "open governance" boards and in enough rfc threads to not be so casually unskeptical.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @izs @nexxylove
like
@wycats has a long history of positively run projects with this kind of governance. I'd be shocked if it were a sham.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I would be as well! But remember, a system does not need all actors to be bad for the system to be bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Not to be cliched, but hold our feet to the fire. We'll make you proud.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.