We agreed to impute strictness on Andreas Rossberg for V8, you were there. https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2015-07-29 …
-
-
Replying to @BrendanEich @lbljeffmo and
we didn't impute strictness, we disallowed ambiguity
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
no imputed strictpic.twitter.com/ngI9HLtj0F
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Not for default parameters. See the notes! The case in question is documented there.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Yes, sorry - not imputed strictness. But you are misconstruing the notes by citing an irrelevancy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
The "micromode" is an early error on "use strict" in a body of a function with non-simple params.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @lbljeffmo and
in the notes you define micromode as "runtime difference" -- early errors are not runtime
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Not my notes! "you define" talking about some other "you" than me. Maybe there's a bug. Shocking!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
I agree micromodes not the issue, so not sure why you mentioned them. Sorry I took the bait! ++
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
they were originally raised by @domenic re: const params for new syntax
-
-
Well,
@domenic said "we kind of ended up with them". I don't agree micromodes == throwing on "use strict".0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.