we didn't impute strictness, we disallowed ambiguity
-
-
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
no imputed strictpic.twitter.com/ngI9HLtj0F
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Not for default parameters. See the notes! The case in question is documented there.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Yes, sorry - not imputed strictness. But you are misconstruing the notes by citing an irrelevancy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @lbljeffmo and
not irrelevant -- but I have no idea what we're debating anymore
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Default parameters irrelevant. Your topic: micromodes where strictness implied by new param syntax
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @lbljeffmo and
the "use strict" restriction does not impute strictness by new param syntax.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Right, rather we reject "use strict" with early error for non-simple parameters. If we're on same
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
BrendanEich Retweeted Yehuda Katz 🥨
page re the "use strict" early error for non-simple, what did you mean by https://twitter.com/wycats/status/783874198095572992 …?
BrendanEich added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
early errors don't change runtime behavior; not same in character
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.