I agreed 100% with @domenic that we shouldn't base semantics on version of JS feature 1st appeared in
-
-
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
We agreed to impute strictness on Andreas Rossberg for V8, you were there. https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2015-07-29 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @lbljeffmo and
we didn't impute strictness, we disallowed ambiguity
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
no imputed strictpic.twitter.com/ngI9HLtj0F
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Not for default parameters. See the notes! The case in question is documented there.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Yes, sorry - not imputed strictness. But you are misconstruing the notes by citing an irrelevancy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @lbljeffmo and
not irrelevant -- but I have no idea what we're debating anymore
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Default parameters irrelevant. Your topic: micromodes where strictness implied by new param syntax
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
BrendanEich Retweeted Yehuda Katz 🥨
Your tweet at https://twitter.com/wycats/status/783874198095572992 … seemed to be about this. If not, then what did you mean?
BrendanEich added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I object to changing runtime behavior due to new-syntax.pic.twitter.com/h6oeTRYkqi
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.