not. invisible. !!!!!
-
-
I agreed 100% with
@domenic that we shouldn't base semantics on version of JS feature 1st appeared in1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
We agreed to impute strictness on Andreas Rossberg for V8, you were there. https://esdiscuss.org/notes/2015-07-29 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @lbljeffmo and
we didn't impute strictness, we disallowed ambiguity
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
no imputed strictpic.twitter.com/ngI9HLtj0F
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Not for default parameters. See the notes! The case in question is documented there.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @lbljeffmo and
Yes, sorry - not imputed strictness. But you are misconstruing the notes by citing an irrelevancy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
The "micromode" is an early error on "use strict" in a body of a function with non-simple params.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
Default parameters do not count as non-simple parameter syntax. Not sure why you cited them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.