I think you're assuming some meaning in my words that I don't intend...
-
-
some long-lived terminology debate where the stakes of this are much higher than I would expect.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I am not saying hypermedia is not useful (I'm the author of a hypermedia spec)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm saying there's a useful distinction between hypermedia and "the media type used by browsers"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and "web standards" are largely concerned with that media type.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
when ppl say "move the web beyond browsers", they're usually conflating things in an unhelpful way
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sadly, the way many people prefer to use browsers these days doesn’t really qualify as “Web”
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
that's the kind of sentiment I'm pushing back on. The web is not an abstract concept 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it's a media type & protocol defined by web standards (produced by W3C, WHATWG, and TC39) 2/2
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
anything not browser-centric and WHATWG throws a tantrum and takes their toys home
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
WHATWG is not the W3C. The W3C has plenty of ppl who used to be extra-browser.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.