nobody has really pushed for it yet. The language is still very young.
-
-
-
Replying to @work_op
1.0 was less than two years ago. Where did you bring it up? Is there a thread on internals or something?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rustlang
twitter, irc, probably subreddit, never took it to mailing list
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @work_op
official work is done through http://internals.rust-lang.org , if it's not there, most will not see it. I'd suggest that path.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rustlang
main reason I haven't done that is all official rust forums are unethical to use because of CoC. My hands are tied
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
irc and subreddit both have CoC, though? if you want to standardize you have to interact with the community *somewhere*
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
the greater community of rust is ethically unreachable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @work_op
so...how is the language (a product of the community) ethical to use/standardize under that scheme?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adam_n_p @dika10sune
once the spec is out I intend to forcibly fork rust, seek funding from sponsors and continue under free speech emphasis
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
what is a free speech emphasis?
-
-
Replying to @wycats @dika10sune
I'm pro-harassment. No speech should ever be deterred for any reason
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.