in particular talk to @littledan @littlecalculist @caridy @domenic @awbjs and @BrendanEich and xref threads
-
-
ah, and Adam Klein from v8 (can't find a twitter?)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
these key players have varied opinions on things but all relate to the narrative, in person talks differ from online as well
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
original talks about a new mime/discussion of a file extension with TC39 were around January?https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/322 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Vote was in April around the file extensionhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/5648 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Node had problems with the package.json approach, partially addressed but ended up w/ file extension... FF to June/July
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@jdalton comes up and champions a grammar change. this was originally scrapped in PR #3 due to TC39 members voting nay1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
FF to TC39 in July, Node had grammar on agenda, pulled wanting to test the water/process first and get in person talks
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
in person talks w/ some had word like "uninteresting" and "uncompelling" relating to Node's problems. Results in rewrite
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't consider node's problems uninteresting or uncompelling. Ember has deep roots in node & want this right
-
-
hopefully meeting outside tc39 can clear the way. Thanks for being a positive voice
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
I know how soul-crushing work like this can be. Thank you for fighting the good fight.
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.