concerns about node interop and ambiguous grammar dominated the multi-hour conversation 2/
-
-
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
it is time that we all got together and tried to find a solution that all of us can live with 3/
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
@thealphanerd ok then what is the practical next step, we’ve been trying that all along1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Fishrock123 @bradleymeck and
we need to meet, in person, and hash it out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
there seems little reason to at this point
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Fishrock123 @bradleymeck and
we have met zero times in person for a sustained period.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
I can't fit this into 60 characters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Fishrock123 @wycats and
from my POV it would be a lot of money to just have our ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Fishrock123 @wycats and
... reiterated to us with no improvement at all
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Fishrock123 @bradleymeck and
sounds like you already arrived at a conclusion. I'm willing to give it a shot.
7:53 AM - 7 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.