any grammar changes and/or asking implementors to slow down so this is sorted before rollout
-
-
What grammar changes? I haven't seen a proposal that I could review and discuss.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
https://github.com/bmeck/UnambiguousJavaScriptGrammar#ecma262-solution … now moved to Sept. agenda, will probably be rewritten by then
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted Bradley Farias
how can this proposal be the explanation for https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/773322168612507648 … if it hasn't been presented yet?
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
private talks, the change is a non-starter for some members
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
not getting the 1st change you wanted doesn't mean you're being blocked. Means we need to work harder
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
I don't believe there is time to do anything if implementations are rolling out behind flags already
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @wycats and
but this is just 1 (not event top 3) of the problems inhttps://github.com/tc39/agendas/pull/214 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck
--
@tomdale asked you why you aren't working with me and@littlecalculist. You said "any disagreement is enough to block" 1/1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
now you're pointing to a list of concerns that you never once reached out to us to discuss 2/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
All I can say is: I am very motivated to work through this. Can we schedule some time to do so? 3/3
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.