I think the decision to drop the non-.mjs alternative was, yes.
-
-
Replying to @tomdale @bradleymeck
I'm surprised you didn't reach out to
@littlecalculist or@wycats to ask for help if you felt stymied.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
a single disagreement is enough to stop any changes; I have large apathy & have been called uncooperative
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
What disagreements are you referring to in this case?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
any grammar changes and/or asking implementors to slow down so this is sorted before rollout
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What grammar changes? I haven't seen a proposal that I could review and discuss.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
https://github.com/bmeck/UnambiguousJavaScriptGrammar#ecma262-solution … now moved to Sept. agenda, will probably be rewritten by then
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted Bradley Farias
how can this proposal be the explanation for https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/773322168612507648 … if it hasn't been presented yet?
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
private talks, the change is a non-starter for some members
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @wycats and
it gets more complicated because there are other concerns like accidental mode swapping that are worrisome
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think your concerns are very valid; we should work together to address them. Can we?
-
-
maybe some other time, not really in a mood to try until I take a break
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.