Very disappointed to see the promising work towards JS modules in Node abandoned in favor of .mjs (again).https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/pull/39 …
-
-
Replying to @tomdale
This attitude is really frustrating to me. Consensus-building is important when laying critical infrastructure.pic.twitter.com/8xb5WWfa20
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @tomdale
I'm in favor of moving quickly and being pragmatic. But the laws of physics for products are different than for open infrastructure.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @tomdale
With infrastructure projects, one rushed bad decision can have knock-on effects for decades. At some point they're too entrenched to fix.
3 replies 10 retweets 22 likes -
-
Replying to @bradleymeck
I think the decision to drop the non-.mjs alternative was, yes.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @tomdale @bradleymeck
I'm surprised you didn't reach out to
@littlecalculist or@wycats to ask for help if you felt stymied.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
a single disagreement is enough to stop any changes; I have large apathy & have been called uncooperative
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I felt you were very cooperative at TC39 & told anyone who would listen. Haven't heard anything since
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.