you're providing backup to the thread of reasoning. What's your direct perspective on web performance?
-
-
Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence
I think web performance is more important than developer convinence when it comes to hitting/missing RAIL
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake @ryanflorence
"Security is more important than developer experience" was rejected by security folks. We should reject it too.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence
I'm not going to ignore the user benefit of performance. If frameworks can't hit RAIL, they're bad for users.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake @ryanflorence
you're assuming the conclusion. We're all working on it, and so is polymer. Nobody is "years ahead".
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
this debate is really about whether FWs have to be "ditched" or "rewritten", which is really just too extreme.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
what I'd prefer is 1) acknowledgement that FWs are trying to hit RAIL, 2) positive sentiment about progress.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
addy's talk at I/O for example. more of that. less of all this ^.
2 replies 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @robwormald @wycats and
What matters is giving users the fastest experience on mobile *whatever* lib/FW powers that.
3 replies 4 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @addyosmani @robwormald and
If you use RAIL, get fast time to app being interactive (& a high Lighthouse score) use w/e.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
the key is recognizing that these things aren't static. Everyone is improving.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.