struggling to find where I provided backup to that tweet
-
-
Replying to @jaffathecake @ryanflorence
you're providing backup to the thread of reasoning. What's your direct perspective on web performance?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence
I think web performance is more important than developer convinence when it comes to hitting/missing RAIL
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake @ryanflorence
"Security is more important than developer experience" was rejected by security folks. We should reject it too.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence
I'm not going to ignore the user benefit of performance. If frameworks can't hit RAIL, they're bad for users.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake @ryanflorence
you're assuming the conclusion. We're all working on it, and so is polymer. Nobody is "years ahead".
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
this debate is really about whether FWs have to be "ditched" or "rewritten", which is really just too extreme.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
what I'd prefer is 1) acknowledgement that FWs are trying to hit RAIL, 2) positive sentiment about progress.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
I see no reason why the world's biggest browser vendor and its team can't do that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence
didn't
@addyosmani give a huge I/O talk that was basically that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yeah and it doesn't match you and @slightlylate's statements about FWs not "hitting RAIL"
-
-
: I'm confused as to why it's somehow necessary for me to avoid saying that slow is bad.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.