The value of frameworks is moving up the stack. Time to shed the "my component model is a special snowflake" bloat.
-
-
-
Replying to @wycats @slightlylate
as flawed as they are, I think in several years you'll look back and see the analogy to promise-hating callbackers.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
the value of being a built in coordination primitive is too high in both cases and will cause ecosystem consensus
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @domenic @slightlylate
I think WCs for leaf nodes are fine in principle, but the technology is welded shut to outsiders.
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
I think there's a path forward, but WC proponents should try to help improve areas FWs are concerned about.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
one major difference: promises were adopted by FWs quickly. WC proponents highly correlated with Chrome/Polymer.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @wycats @slightlylate
that's a good point. Might be because of polyfillability, but maybe not. I do find this very worrying.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
FWIW I am v detached from Chrome/polymer for whatever reason & think this is why WC made no sense to me
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Polymer closing gaps via non-standard extensions, while genuinely good, creates a barrier btwn Polymer and WC
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
and polymer people talking a strong game about WC being ready feels off to ppl who just look at the standard.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.