unless you can show me some magic HBS file without any loops or branches @ryanflorence @wycats @chantastic
-
-
Replying to @joegaudet @jkarttunen and
it's about structure not logic. 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @joegaudet and
you have to be a human interpreter to understand the structure of a JSX function 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @joegaudet and
as a programmer, I don't prefer that, but as a designer who doesn't know JS, it's hard 3/
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @joegaudet and
there are cost/benefits on both sides. being honest with ourselves helps 4/4
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
100%. The context in HBS gets a bit fuzzy for me, & the multiple call methods actions
@jkarttunen@ryanflorence@chantastic1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joegaudet @jkarttunen and
the context is just lexical scope + optional self (a la Ruby).
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
I think the issue from a dev stand point is you have to learn yet another language
@jkarttunen@ryanflorence@chantastic1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joegaudet @jkarttunen and
you have to learn a language, or the rules of the JS subset either way, tbh.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
yeah you’re not wrong there. Seems like a bit more cognitive overhead.
@jkarttunen@ryanflorence@chantastic1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
which? to me, the cognitive overhead of "it's JSX, but treat it like a pure lang" is high.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.