I thought @Gankro was referring to deeper divergence of AS3 from ES3 than AS2 :)
-
-
ah oki, well ... AS3 is fully compatible with ES3, see the spechttps://github.com/as3lang/ActionScript3/wiki/Specification#2 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@github that says AS3 was compatible with ES4, which failed for the same reason.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
ES4 wasn't remotely compatible with ES3 in the real world.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @tshepang_dev and
imho the fail/rejection of ES4 was more a timing issue of "we are not ready for that yet" at the time
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zwetan @tshepang_dev and
as an avid user for TS and champion of decorators in TC39, I don't agree
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @tshepang_dev and
adding features forever to a PL can be problematic, eg. the perl6/php6/python3 problem
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zwetan @tshepang_dev and
those are examples of incompatible changes not "adding features forever"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
examples of compatible changes: JS, WWW, Ruby, Java, C#, C++
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @tshepang_dev and
I'm not against changes in PL, but still a C# 2.0 vs a C# 5.0 does not feel the same PL
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
that's a feature not a bug. Compatible code != Compatible idioms. Stability without Stagnation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.