Wat? That's so weird.
-
-
Replying to @stubbornella @wycats
new team I just joined is scrum-on-waterfall. The VPEng talks Agile (hence scrum) but all the principles are waterfall
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
reason being, big financial suite requiring many legal compliance tasks, takes tons of planning
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
and the basic things that make XP or Agile work well are often rendered moot for what we're doing
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @revin @stubbornella
even the most slow-moving dinosaurs have late-breaking requirements. Quite often more so! ("Congress passed a law...")
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @stubbornella
yes, that's exactly were most of our requirements changes come from. I'm not sure what we'll do then (still new here)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but my guess is laws typically have enough lead time built in that it works out. Or we all panic. I'll find out
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
anyway, my point is that I agree with y'all, just providing a real example of a 2016 project
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @revin @stubbornella
The government report on Challenger blames 'freezes' (waterfall style) unable to handle changespic.twitter.com/lqTBdD4r7y
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
but again, it's not waterfall if you correct things in XP. It's something else.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Right. :) Totally agree. More than you realize! :D
-
-
one problem is that while the answer is balance, people make caricatured arguments from one perspective or the other
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
they figure if they pick a religion they know what to do. But careful balance based on the problem isn't in the cards
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.