TLDR: you need JS for lie-fi and offline reliability, and that's 2016's scarcity
-
-
Replying to @wycats @briankardell and
PE thinking began ~2003/5 but methodology is evolving. Shortening critical render path etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scottjehl @wycats and
and if I may, quite results & evidence driven. Sounds like we do need a reboot...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scottjehl @briankardell and
I find the fact that I am considered "on the other side" despite FastBoot to be
#fail1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @scottjehl and
PE advocates have been too ideological for too long. We need a focus on evidence.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
our blog has a bunch of wpt-driven research on PE, critical path, font, js start-render costs that I'd love for you to check out.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @scottjehl @wycats
anyway. I follow & respect your work and didn't say you're on any 'other' side. Just respectfully disagreed with your point is all
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scottjehl
Link me to the first stuff you'd want me to read :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @scottjehl
I find the "PE means no-JS" attitude to be outdated, that's all.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @scottjehl
PE people will often say "I don't mean no-JS", but "must work without JS" is absolutely a core tenet.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
"of course we're ok w/ JS" is like RMS saying "of course we're ok w/ making money w/ GPL". True, but hides important details.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.