you mean the CTC's decisions, which doesn't speak for all of "node"
1 of the reasons for that is that you insisted on writing summaries that characterized our position without asking if we agreed
-
-
I bet if I wrote up your position in an uncharitable way as a proposal to TC39 which TC39 then approved, you'd get upset
-
Note I still feel this way talking about a lot of proposals that go in different directions I don't like, v. hard to be objective
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I did not ask if you agreed, that is correct, but the wiki is editable. In addition I wrote summaries that I felt were necessary. \1
-
asking to write summaries does mean I have a viewpoint. this goes back to the problem of "we" generally never including everyone \2
-
i did my best to stay at least somewhat objective on the topic, and discussed large summaries of comments in those few bullet points
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.