@github this was discussed (even with the author). If you have questions outside of the things discussed by CTC let me know.
during the .mjs debate, people repeatedly claimed that @littlecalculist, @caridy and I were interlopers
-
-
when in fact we are deeply involved in the node ecosystem and maintain packages used by many, many people.
-
we can continue to operate under the "interloper" assumption, but it's not going to land us up in a good place long-term
-
we can do better than that.
-
I would agree on being seen as "different". I continue to feel that way after having months of talks that became less than pleasant
-
1 of the reasons for that is that you insisted on writing summaries that characterized our position without asking if we agreed
-
I bet if I wrote up your position in an uncharitable way as a proposal to TC39 which TC39 then approved, you'd get upset
-
Note I still feel this way talking about a lot of proposals that go in different directions I don't like, v. hard to be objective
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and I have been called out for not being on TC39 before.
-
whoever did that shouldn't have done that. What did they mean?
-
unsure honestly, though assumption is that I didn't have any affect on consensus? was upsetting. \1
-
hm. which assumption was that?
-
the assumption about: what my relevance on not being on TC39 was.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.