Node.js choosing .mjs will likely go down as one of the most shortsided decisions made by their leaders. Reminds me of Python 3.
you mean the CTC's decisions, which doesn't speak for all of "node"
-
-
define all of node? This style of argument is less than productive.
-
sorry I didn't mean a style of argument. I just mean the current governance doesn't represent everyone.
-
you are welcome to join TC39 (and I understand that you plan to). Am I welcome to join the CTC?
-
you should be if you go through the process. Though reqs are more on the side of contribution than pay to play.
-
during the .mjs debate, people repeatedly claimed that
@littlecalculist,@caridy and I were interlopers -
when in fact we are deeply involved in the node ecosystem and maintain packages used by many, many people.
-
we can continue to operate under the "interloper" assumption, but it's not going to land us up in a good place long-term
-
we can do better than that.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.