um. no.
I don't agree with the implication that TC39 made no changes in response to node
-
-
I think that's just empirically not true, and not in minor ways.
-
then we could agree this outcome indicates another iteration on the spec is needed
-
and that iteration would do what? make a concrete proposal
@wycats@bradleymeck@littlecalculist@caridy -
rework the spec. with impl feedback so these two terrible options don't manifest.
-
that’s not very concrete
@wycats@bradleymeck@littlecalculist@caridy -
I strongly disagree.
-
when i say concrete i mean: details matter, please write up a gist proposal
@wycats@bradleymeck@littlecalculist@caridy -
and that proposal should enumerate changes to the spec you’d like to see
@wycats@bradleymeck@littlecalculist@caridy
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.