so the transpile proved Node is good at CJS not implementation of esmodules, eh
-
-
Replying to @brianleroux @wycats and
spec should take *real* implementation feedback and rework from that (no?)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
this thread is a weird outcome if that were the case
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux @bradleymeck and
.mjs and package.json is unrelated to anything TC39 specced
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @brianleroux and
it is a result of looking at implementation of spec. The move from idea to concrete
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @brianleroux and
the transpilers were a first impl. Cowpaths. Node can make other decisions.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @brianleroux and
and we did. We are gonna break things. Just made decisions for different reasons
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @brianleroux and
that's fine. But calling transpilers abstract and node concrete is weird.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
obviously you understand the argument. Weird is disingenuously pretending you don't.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I strongly disagree with the argument.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.