I guess Node as an implementation target isn't a concern for tc39 just browsers?
-
-
-
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
so the transpile proved Node is good at CJS not implementation of esmodules, eh
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianleroux @wycats and
spec should take *real* implementation feedback and rework from that (no?)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
this thread is a weird outcome if that were the case
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux @bradleymeck and
.mjs and package.json is unrelated to anything TC39 specced
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @brianleroux and
it is a result of looking at implementation of spec. The move from idea to concrete
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @brianleroux and
the transpilers were a first impl. Cowpaths. Node can make other decisions.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
but transpilers are just as much an impl as node is.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
the term "transpiler" confuses. They're just compilers, like c++ compilers.
11:23 AM - 29 May 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.