compilers are an implementation, but that point isn't very interesting.
the transpilers were a first impl. Cowpaths. Node can make other decisions.
-
-
having transpilers is way better than specs with no user testing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and we did. We are gonna break things. Just made decisions for different reasons
-
I gotta go watch x-men, but let's continue this offline.
-
I don't agree with the implication that TC39 made no changes in response to node
-
I think that's just empirically not true, and not in minor ways.
-
then we could agree this outcome indicates another iteration on the spec is needed
-
and that iteration would do what? make a concrete proposal
@wycats@bradleymeck@littlecalculist@caridy -
rework the spec. with impl feedback so these two terrible options don't manifest.
-
that’s not very concrete
@wycats@bradleymeck@littlecalculist@caridy - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
but transpilers are just as much an impl as node is.
-
the term "transpiler" confuses. They're just compilers, like c++ compilers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.