correction: early adopters of syntax transpiled to CJS. Not an implementation. 
-
-
Replying to @brianleroux @bradleymeck and
compilers are an implementation, but that point isn't very interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
papering over the reason there's two bad implementation options is interesting
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianleroux @wycats and
I guess Node as an implementation target isn't a concern for tc39 just browsers?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
so the transpile proved Node is good at CJS not implementation of esmodules, eh
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brianleroux @wycats and
spec should take *real* implementation feedback and rework from that (no?)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @wycats @bradleymeck and
this thread is a weird outcome if that were the case
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianleroux @bradleymeck and
.mjs and package.json is unrelated to anything TC39 specced
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @wycats @brianleroux and
we expressly left the loader out so that these decisions could be led by impls
11:20 AM - 29 May 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.