We did indeed talk to you quite a lot. And after all of that, the decision simply repeats the original args.
-
-
papering over the reason there's two bad implementation options is interesting
-
I guess Node as an implementation target isn't a concern for tc39 just browsers?
-
so the transpile proved Node is good at CJS not implementation of esmodules, eh
-
spec should take *real* implementation feedback and rework from that (no?)
-
yes, that happened.
-
this thread is a weird outcome if that were the case
-
.mjs and package.json is unrelated to anything TC39 specced
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
