I believe that shows a communication issue at the very least, and both sides could listen to each other
-
-
which are the sides?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The people who are content with Rails and Ruby as a whole, and the people who are not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
which camp do you consider me in?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Honestly, I'd put you in the latter camp because you've given code to the community and promoted change.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think that's accurate. So it probably means something that I'm saying I have collaborated effectively with
@dhh, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh, 100%
I'd prefer to see no one ever truly happy with an OSS project and for things to always be changing2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think that the software community still has a lot to learn from what made Rails so productive for people.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
but instead, we are re-litigating the "complexity wars" over and over again.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
this is right where the crux of the issue is, I think. We all want simplicity but don't agree on what it means
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
honestly, the use of the term "simplicity" and especially well-actuallying via "simple vs. easy" turns me off big time
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.