not sure what you mean. There is no web api to display the camera with a custom ui.
-
-
Yeah, I'm not saying web is there - we added a bunch of APIs to gecko for Firefox OS, for Instagram like apps.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @Vjeux and
that's why I questioned head to head. If web could be evolved to do more, sooner, maybe RN on web isn't best.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
yeah I really question the idea that the only options are "own a browser" and "RN on the web"
5 replies 5 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
The other viable option is to throw the baby out w/ bath water and dbl down on using native SDKs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jordwalke @wycats and
I believe w/out RN, this is what would often happen, yet we wouldn't even be talking about it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jordwalke @wycats and
FB can afford native mostly, triplicating effort -- but still some webviews. Others can't afford.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
I think we underestimate the cost of developing a good UX for the web. Often triple.
@jordwalke@wycats@Vjeux@justinfagnani1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sebmarkbage @BrendanEich
For example the fact that image decoding is STILL not async yet. Soon. Not yet.
@jordwalke@wycats@Vjeux@justinfagnani2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sebmarkbage @BrendanEich and
image decode in a web worker + TA transfer is an abstractable workaround
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
certainly not a reason to completely abandon the basic model of the web
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.