right, and #TooMuchJS lumps ember in with WebGL adherents.
-
-
Replying to @wycats @justinfagnani
"if the problem is too much JS, Ember seems to have the most, so Ember must be the worst"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
I haven't looked at Ember's JS size to lump it in with that, don't assume every generalism is an attack against you.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @justinfagnani @wycats
But, if you think Ember has the most JS, maybe it can come down in future versions be embracing the platform even more :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats
hey, I'm not even sure that Ember _has_ the most JS, but it seems to be a concern of yours. If it is, I think the platform can help
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @justinfagnani
the reason I pointed to
@addyosmani is that he did the legwork to notice what we're working on. You should too.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Addy's talk gave me an incredible amount of hope for the future of web apps...
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @robwormald @wycats and
...all of the teams involved work incredibly hard to deliver A+ experiences. Demonstrated what's possible
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
