Like I said, Ember is pretty good in this respect.
-
-
Replying to @justinfagnani
right, and
#TooMuchJS lumps ember in with WebGL adherents.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wycats @justinfagnani
"if the problem is too much JS, Ember seems to have the most, so Ember must be the worst"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats
I haven't looked at Ember's JS size to lump it in with that, don't assume every generalism is an attack against you.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @justinfagnani @wycats
But, if you think Ember has the most JS, maybe it can come down in future versions be embracing the platform even more :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats @justinfagnani
if you want to do this on your own, fine, but I'd rather we did it together.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @justinfagnani @wycats
I'll also be the first to admin that Polymer can improve and shrink greatly with better use of the platform. I'm excited about that!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @justinfagnani @wycats
It's not a damning criticism to say we can get better and smaller. Frameworks had a tougher job in years past because of gaps in web
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm saying that your messaging lumps Ember in with "build your own platform" giving an opening to the WebGL peeps to confuse
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
