Between .mjs and package.json: Both are viable technical solutions. The debate is about whether we want config vs convention.
-
-
@lbljeffmo there is also a middle ground (modules.root) for poly-packages in transition. 2/2 -
@wycats correct, and the alternative has no config and fewer rule branches -
@lbljeffmo I'm a big believer in convention over configuration, but convention w/o configuration: no thx -
@wycats clearly ;) but I dont think youll make a convincing point with generalizations. My pref for mjs is about simplicity and granularity -
@wycats the disambiguation folds nicely into a file ext. I dont share a distaste for writing ".mjs" and dont mind writing new JS w it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.