@jaffathecake some may argue is is the intent of template strings, and doing the work via Babel at build is merely an optimization
-
-
Replying to @stefanpenner
@stefanpenner I think the build time stuff is a real distraction here - you can do that stuff without template strings (eg static-module)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@stefanpenner using foo`bar` just because the func takes a single string arg seems restrictive to me1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake maybe, but for these cases it is unclear what other args would mean.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stefanpenner
@jaffathecake also it’s a great hint to a text editor re:syntax highlighting and stuff1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stefanpenner
@stefanpenner would be nice to find a way to do that without needing a function call, eg for strings used in blog URLs for workers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake I’m confused why a language feature is considered a hack? This is the intent of template strings3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stefanpenner
@stefanpenner@jaffathecake this is definitely not the intent of tagged template strings.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @domenic
@domenic@jaffathecake templating strings isn’t the point of template strings?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stefanpenner
@stefanpenner@jaffathecake did you miss the word "tagged"?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@domenic @stefanpenner @jaffathecake I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that it's inappropriate to use the tag to tag a string.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.