@awbjs as far as the spec is concerned TCO is "unobservable" therefore JSC does not need to revert it.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
@wycats@bterlson@samth here is why I think Moz concern is weak https://github.com/tc39/proposal-ptc-syntax/issues/2#issuecomment-209154031 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
New conversation
-
-
-
-
@jorendorff@wycats@awbjs@bterlson The JSC devtools approach seemed quite reasonable. Better than what you get for `for` loops. ;) -
-
@jorendorff@wycats@awbjs@bterlson I think they wrote about maintaining a buffer for dbg when they landed tail calls. I'll try to find it. -
@samth@jorendorff@wycats@bterlson@filpizlo recall a thing that got PTC over the hump for ES6 was ref to effective debug approach. Sam? -
@samth@jorendorff@wycats@bterlson@filpizlo meeting notes hard to find for that period -
@awbjs I think the relevant meeting was at Yahoo (with the glass whiteboards).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats@awbjs@bterlson@samth Let's get people on the record. Cc:@littlecalculistThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.