@awbjs I'm not in favor of removal but I am in favor of reality. Implementor revolt is a risk of the pre-ES2016 process.
@awbjs the claim that there's an interop with removal issue because JSC already impl'ed is either wrong or missing significant detail.
-
-
@awbjs that doesn't mean we can remove. But if it's the best the pro-keeping camp has, it doesn't move me. -
@awbjs they'd have better success arguing on the merits of the feature than making process objections based on inaccurate claims. -
@awbjs it would not be hard to avoid a new anti-PTC consensus just by arguing for PTC strongly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.