-
-
Replying to @mitsuhiko
@mitsuhiko@dhh sure, but npm says this isn't about a trademark dispute at all, but rather their own opinion.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@mitsuhiko Yes, it's their opinion that the trademark holder had a strong case that they would lose in court. Good assessment imo.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @dhh
@dhh@mitsuhiko Did you read their blog post. They expressly say it was NOT a decision based on IP.4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wycats
ashley williams Retweeted ashley williams
@wycats@dhh@mitsuhiko yehuda is correcthttps://twitter.com/ag_dubs/status/712669386511949824 …ashley williams added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ag_dubs
@ag_dubs@wycats@mitsuhiko That is the essence of trademark protection! Guarding against consumer confusion. Perfectly legit.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dhh
@dhh@wycats@mitsuhiko it was actively *not* a legal decision,@izs stated as suchpic.twitter.com/0VvGSkQGX0
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ag_dubs
@ag_dubs@wycats@mitsuhiko@izs Just happened to coincide with TM claim?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dhh
@dhh@wycats@mitsuhiko@izs there were no official legal claims at all. kik mentioned the possibility of one briefly to azer, but that's it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ag_dubs
@ag_dubs@wycats@mitsuhiko@izs If TM holder mentioned the possibility, that'll get treated as legal claim by anyone sensible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dhh @ag_dubs @mitsuhiko @izs they didn't mention any specific TM claim, and didn't particularly escalate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.