@thejameskyle this seems weird; they have 400 active members; we have more.
-
-
Replying to @wycats
@thejameskyle I want to learn more about this alleged secret limit.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @jamiebuilds
@thejameskyle I've read this carefully and have found it eerily missing critical info. Who did they talk to? What exactly did they say?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@thejameskyle in another post they say invites were disabled due to a sneaky limit in the API but nothing more.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jamiebuilds
@thejameskyle@wycats there weren't many details to be missing, it was pretty simple -- too many members, not designed for that1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lbljeffmo
@lbljeffmo@thejameskyle I've worked with some big (paying) companies with thousands of active users. Slack needs to support that case.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@wycats@lbljeffmo yeah it's rather silly considering the number of companies that would be willing to pay A LOT for slacks that size.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jamiebuilds
@thejameskyle@lbljeffmo I've been inside a Slack that size for a company that paid a lot for it ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@thejameskyle @lbljeffmo I am skeptical that they don't consider 5k people a priority given enterprise customer needs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.