The thing missing from anti-Slack discussions is how enabling Slack-in-OSS is for thousands of people over the "open" alternatives.
@thejameskyle this seems weird; they have 400 active members; we have more.
-
-
@thejameskyle I want to learn more about this alleged secret limit. -
@thejameskyle I've read this carefully and have found it eerily missing critical info. Who did they talk to? What exactly did they say? -
@thejameskyle in another post they say invites were disabled due to a sneaky limit in the API but nothing more. -
@wycats There was a direct email from Slack about it, I'll try to find it. -
@thejameskyle@wycats there weren't many details to be missing, it was pretty simple -- too many members, not designed for that -
@lbljeffmo@thejameskyle I've worked with some big (paying) companies with thousands of active users. Slack needs to support that case. -
@wycats@lbljeffmo yeah it's rather silly considering the number of companies that would be willing to pay A LOT for slacks that size. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats@thejameskyle There were apparently 7500 members of the slack org (don't know active numbers).@benigeri probably has some real#s. -
@zpao@wycats@thejameskyle Depends what you mean by active member. We frequently had > 1K people online. -
@benigeri@zpao@thejameskyle And Discord now has a few hundred. Seems like a huge drop. -
@wycats@zpao@thejameskyle Sunday evening PST is probably the slowest time of the week. I've seen 700/800 some times during the past week.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wycats "reactiflux" it was like 8000 usersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.