@wycats how do you read what you're saying out of identities for bind/return and associativity?
-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp I'm assuming that we both understand what the definition of the monad type is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@bitemyapp You are only interested in discussing its definition. I am not.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp Do you simply disagree with https://wiki.haskell.org/Monad ?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
@wycats but thank you for bringing it to my attention. I will fix it :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp I see; the definition of "monad" on the Haskell wiki is "wrong" because it talks about application...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bitemyapp "Then monads serve to provide the benefits of separation of concerns" also wrong? "separation of concerns" blasphemy?
10:17 PM - 23 Oct 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.