@bitemyapp You, on the other hand, are making a strong claim. That they should *only* be understood by the Laws.
-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
@wycats but I would prefer that people not muddle up the topic with weird statements like it being about non-local effects.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp monads allow you to run some computation sure that (certain) non-local effects are encapsulated. Is that wrong?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp it's wrong because it's not *all* monads can do, or because it's not what monads sometimes do?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp but does it describe what Monad is often useful for?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@wycats and even then, it's a pretty bad explanation of, say, Maybe.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp it's actually a pretty great explanation of Maybe ;)
9:58 PM - 23 Oct 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.