1/ in my opinion, the goal of good boundaries and isolation is to let you be "sloppy in the small, rigorous in the large"
-
-
Replying to @wycats
2/ Dynamic languages simply don't allow rigorous in the small, and that has great benefits in many ways.
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @wycats
3/ Breaking isolation boundaries makes the "sloppy in the small" leak into the large and eventually slow you down.
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @wycats
4/4 But if you have tiny isolation boundaries, you're just trying to recover "rigorous in the small", poor fit for dynlang.
3 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @isaac32767
@isaac32767 I think the answer is tautologous from the rest of my statements. Function boundaries offer insufficient tools for rigor.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
@isaac32767 it's easy to say "YAGNI rigor", but I think what happens in reality is that larger isolation boundaries take their place.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@isaac32767 And I think that's fine. Sloppiness can be correlated with productivity in the small!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.